1.In academic circles, people take aging research as just an interest area where they can try to develop interventions.
在学术界，人们把衰老研究作为一个兴趣领域，在其中尝试开发干预措施。
2.Interventions to minimize or prevent disabilities.
干预以最大限度减少或预防残疾。
3.Other interventions are less admirable.
其他一些的经济干预措施也不太明智。
4.This comes from carefully conducted 'before and after' evaluations of interventions in schools, monitored by a research team.
这是一个研究小组对学校干预措施实行前后仔细评估得出的结论。
5.Some human interventions also caused collateral damage.
一些人类的介入也产生了相应的破坏。
6.Evidence of multidimensional interventions, however, is scarce.
然而，多层面干预措施的证据是缺乏的。
7.Even more impressive is the progress in just a single year: human interventions fell from 0.8 times per thousand miles to 0.2, which translates into a 400% improvement.
更令人印象深刻的是仅仅在一年内的进步：人为干预从每千英里的0.8倍下降到0.2倍，这意味着改善了400％。
8.Various interventions, such as infection-fighting drugs, can increase a population's average survival time, but only approaches that slow the body's rate of aging will increase the maximum lifespan.
各种干预措施，如抗感染药物，可以增加人口的平均存活时间，但只有那些减缓人体衰老速度的方法才能延长最长寿命。